GPU comparison · 1080p benchmark
Compare RX 6600 8GB and RX 7600 8GB using GPUsed's recorded model-level benchmark FPS. See the percentage difference, then open the full comparison tool if you want to choose another card.
RX 7600 8GB recorded 174 FPS against 133 FPS for RX 6600 8GB. These are continuous 1080p benchmark averages, not predicted FPS in any particular game.
RX 6600 8GB
133Benchmark FPS at 1080p- Benchmark score
- 17 / 100
- Graphics memory
- 8GB
- Released
- October 2021
RX 7600 8GB
174Benchmark FPS at 1080p- Benchmark score
- 22.2 / 100
- Graphics memory
- 8GB
- Released
- May 2023
Change either GPU in the comparison tool
What does this comparison mean?
Both cards carry 8GB, but the newer RX 7600 has a sizeable advantage in this benchmark. Look beyond the unchanged capacity when judging this replacement.
Both variants have 8GB of graphics memory. Memory capacity, board dimensions, power connectors and the price of a particular used card are separate from this benchmark. Compare the exact item before deciding whether to upgrade.
The two GPUs in context
RX 6600 8GB
The 8GB RX 6600 scaled RDNA 2 down to an efficient 1080p card with a useful memory buffer. Its original price was not transformative, yet its lower power and practical gaming role gave it a clear place in the family.
RX 7600 8GB
The 8GB RX 7600 brought RDNA 3 to mainstream 1080p gaming with a compact Navi 33 design. It was a competent entry into the new family, while its memory capacity limited how far that role could stretch.
Release dates: RX 6600 8GB source · RX 7600 8GB source.
How the figures are compared
Both FPS figures come from the owner-supplied GPUsed benchmark dataset. GPUsed reports a continuous FurMark run at 1080p for its physical-card checks. The percentage above compares the higher model average with the lower one; the score scales every model against the fastest GPU in the current dataset, which scores 100. A benchmark result does not predict gaming FPS, and the percentage may change with the benchmark dataset.